Dr. Yanity's academic/PERSONAL website
  • Home
  • JRN275: News Reporting
    • JRN275: Schedule
  • JRN589: Critical Issues in Sport
    • JRN589: Schedule
    • Presentations Sp21
  • Meet Your Professor

JRN552: Graduate Media Law 

Picture
SYLLABUS
Everything you need to know about this course is found here. This includes course learning objectives, textbooks, topics, assignments and course policies.
Picture
WEEKLY MODULES
The weekly lessons are available on the Quinnipiac Blackboard site, as required by QU Online. The current week's module is available to see below with previous ones lower on the page.
Module 4: Sources & Subpoenas - Newsgatherers' Privilege
Learning objectives
  1. Understand how far journalists can -- and legally can't -- go to protect the identity of sources
  2. Explain what a "shield law" is
  3. Understand your state's shield law
  4. Identify and understand "Reporter's Privilege"
  5. Intelligently ponder (and maybe even answer) the question: "Who is a journalist?" 
  6. Identify and legally explain incidents when journalists have gone to jail to protect sources
Mod 4 Activities
In order to achieve the learning objectives, students must complete the following:
  • Read: BSO, Chapter 8, pp. 361-392
  • *Read: "Fox Reporter Faces Jail Over Refusal to Identify Sources" in NY Times (April 9, 2013)
  • *Read: "Jana Winter's Victory" in Columbia Journalism Review (Dec. 11, 2013)
  • Read & analyze (ie, compare to others close by) your state's shield law -- note: This is not to be turned in, but you will need it for your final exam.
  • Submit case briefings (see below)
  • Answer weekly question (no later than Friday) and discuss in Discussions (no later than Sunday)
* These articles follow the story of Jana Winter, a Fox News reporter who was jailed for not revealing her sources. You will have read a bit about her in the text, but this offers more detail and the final outcome.
Mod 4 Cases (to be briefed)
See instructions for how to brief a case on Blackboard and use the outline as an example to brief the following:
​
  • Branzburg v. Hayes (408 U.S. 665) 1972 -- There are three plaintiffs in this (Caldwell, Pappas & Branzburg.) Explain all three.
  • Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. (501 U.S. 663) 1991
  • Zurcher v. The Stanford Daily  (436 U.S. 547) 1978

Module 3: Freedom of Information & Access to Places
Learning objectives
  1. Identify and understand the statutory laws that permit public access to the documents generated by government agencies and to the meetings of government bodies
  2. Identify what you as a citizen and journalist are allowed to access
  3. Explain the federal Freedom of Information Act, or "FOIA" (You will hear reporters refer to this as "FOY-UH." Just FYI.)
  4. Memorize and understand the limitations of FOIA (Much of this will be revisited when we tackle PRIVACY)
  5. Understand how to use the Clery Act
  6. Explain your state's FOI laws
  7. ** Know how to acquire information granted under FOIA and Sunshine Laws -- I was toying around with the idea of having you write one that is specific to your home state. I decided against it, but expect to see it on the test.
  8. Know what to do as a citizen/journalist if a Freedom of Information Law is violated
  9. Know where you are legally permitted to be as a reporter
Mod 3 Activities
In order to achieve the learning objectives, students must complete the following:
  • Read: BSO, Chapter 9, pp. 393-434
  • Read: "The First Amendment Handbook," Chapter 9, pp. 69-75
  • Read & analyze (compare to others): Your state's Freedom of Information law -- this is not to be turned in, but I guarantee it will save you lots of time on the midterm if you thoughtfully analyze and write this out
  • Submit case briefings (see below)
  • Answer weekly question (no later than Thursday) and discuss in Discussions (no later than Sunday)
Mod 3 Cases (to be briefed)
​​See instructions for how to brief a case on Blackboard and use the outline as an example to brief the following:
  • ACLU v. Dept. of Justice (681 F.3d 61) 2012
  • Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (489 U.S. 749) 1989
  • National Archive v. Favish (541 U.S. 157) 2004  ** Explain the Earnhart Family Protection Act in Florida, too. What was this about? (Write it as an addendum to NA v. Favish. It's not a CASE, but I want you to know what it is.)
  • U.S. v. Miami University (294 F.3d 797) 2002
  • Reno v. Condon (528 U.S. 141) 2000
  • AP v. Otter (682 F.3d 821) 2012

Module 2: Content Regulation (Fair Use & Copyright)
Learning objectives
  1. Identify what can and can not be copyrighted
  2. Explain the process of securing a copyright
  3. Identify what a copyright givs you
  4. Memorize and understand the Fair Use Doctrine
  5. Identify alternatives to traditional copyright law
  6. Explain how copyright and fair use have evolved with the advances of technology
Mod 2 Activities
In order to achieve the learning objectives, students must complete the following: ​
  • Read BSO, Chapter 6, pp. 245-326
  • Read "Copyright and Digital Media in a Post-Napster World" from The Berkman Center (Harvard Law School)
  • Submit case briefings (see to the right)
  • Answer weekly question (no later than Thursday) and discuss in Discussions (no later than Sunday)
​
Mod 2 Cases (to be briefed) 
See instructions for how to brief a case on Blackboard and use the outline as an example to brief the following:
  • Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (464 U.S. 417), 1989
  • Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music (510 U.S. 569), 1994
  • Lenz v. Universal Music (572 F. Supp. 2d 1150), 2007
  • Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid (490 U.S. 730), 1989
  • New York Times v. Tasini (533 U.S. 483), 2001

Module 1: The U.S. Court System & Prior Restraint
Learning objectives
  1. Understand the role and the structure of the U.S. Court system
  2. Identify the path of a lawsuit through the above court system
  3. Understand and recognize the uniqueness of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by tracing the law's history and theories surrounding its importance
  4. Identify modern challenges to the First Amendment
  5. Identify and understand foundational cases of PRIOR RESTRAINT (censorship)
  6. Understand "time, place & manner" regulations and why they exist
  7. Detail the cases assigned to be briefed
  8. Understand what happened in and the long-term ramifications of the Pentagon Papers affair and the Edward Snowden case
Mod 1 Activities
In order to achieve the learning objectives, students must complete the following: 
  • Read Belmas, Shepard & Overbeck (the main text, hereafter refered to as "BSO"), pp. 1-124
  • Read "What is the FISA Court?" and "How a Court Secretly Evolved"
  • Watch John Oliver on Government Surveillance
  • Watch "Citizenfour" (Can be rented on Amazon for $3.99)
  • Watch "The Most Dangerous Man in America"
  • Submit case briefings 
  • Answer weekly question (no later than Thursday) and discuss in Discussions (no later than Sunday)
Mod 1 Cases (to be briefed) 
See instructions for how to brief a case on Blackboard and use the outline as an example to brief the following:
  • Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc. (556 U.S. 868)
  • Abrams v. U.S. (250 U.S. 616)
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio (395 U.S. 444)
  • Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA (133 S.Ct. 1138)
  • Near v. Minnesota (283 U.S. 697)
  • New York Times v. U.S. (403 U.S. 713)
  • Harman v. City of New York (140 F.3d 111)
  • R.A.V. v. St Paul (505 U.S. 377)
  • Bland v. Roberts (730, F.3rd 368)
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • JRN275: News Reporting
    • JRN275: Schedule
  • JRN589: Critical Issues in Sport
    • JRN589: Schedule
    • Presentations Sp21
  • Meet Your Professor